.
L'Eglise réformée de France critique la politique d'immigration.
Le synode national de l'Eglise réformée de France,
réuni à Toulouse les quatre premiers jours de mai,
s'inquiète des conséquences de la politique menée
dans le domaine de l'immigration par le gouvernement. Les effets des
quotas d'expulsion de la politique du gouvernement sont contraires aux
convictions chrétiennes et peuvent être dramatiques pour
les étrangers que les protestants côtoient dans leurs
paroisses, au travail ou ailleurs. […]
Les délégués se sont élevés contre
le projet de directive européenne concernant le retour des
étrangers illégaux, qui banalise leur enfermement, dont
la possibilité est portée à 18 mois assorti d'une
interdiction de territoire européen de 5 ans.
Le synode espère que la future présidence
française de l'Union européenne permettra de
considérer les ressortissants des pays tiers de manière
humaine et digne de la Déclaration des Droits de l'homme.
Lire
le communiqué en entier.

.
Position commune des JRS en Europe sur la détention [mars 2008]
The members of JRS in Europe have taken into consideration :
• The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights
• The 1950 European Convention for the
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by
Protocol No. 11, with Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13
• The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of
Refugees and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees
• The 1966 International Covenants on Civil and
Political Rights, and on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
• The 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child
• The 1999 UNHCR Revised Guidelines on
Applicable Criteria and Standards Relating to the Detention of Asylum
Seekers
• The 2005 Guidelines of the Committee of
Ministers of the Council of Europe on Forced Return Including Detention
Upon Removal
• The ongoing jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
For the purpose of this position paper, and within the context of its
work, the members of JRS in Europe agree to the following definition of
‘administrative detention’ :
A situation in which a third-country national is confined within a
narrowly bounded or restricted location, and where he or she
experiences a deprivation of liberty; this measure must be for
administrative reasons and not as a measure of the criminal justice
system.
The positions enumerated below shall apply to the administrative
detention of asylum seekers and irregular migrants while they are in
the territory of a State, or prior to being admitted onto the
State’s territory.
The members of JRS in Europe agree to the following principles:
A. Anyone who is fleeing from severe human rights
violations has an inalienable right to seek protection in another
country,
B. Individuals and their families shall not be
punished, administratively or criminally, for submitting an asylum
claim by the national authorities of the country to which they seek
protection,
C. Authorities of the countries of reception shall
take the utmost care to provide for the well-being and safety of asylum
applicants,
D. Children who seek asylum in another country,
whether they are accompanied or not, and by reasons of their physical
and mental vulnerability, require the provision of special safeguards
and care, including appropriate legal protection and the unity of the
family, as to the extent that it is in the best interest of the child.
The members of JRS in Europe agree to the following positions:
1. No asylum seeker shall be detained during his or her asylum procedure.
2. Administrative detention shall not be used as a deterrent against persons who seek asylum.
3. Administrative detention of irregular migrants shall be avoided to the utmost extent possible.
4. If detention cannot be avoided, it should be only used in accordance with the principle of proportionality.
5. Legislation shall provide for, and policy makers
shall implement, alternatives to detention that respect human dignity
and fundamental human rights.
6. Families with children shall not be detained in
closed detention centres. Family unity shall be maintained at all
times, as long as it is in the best interest of the child. Alternatives
to detention must be found in the case of families.
7. Unaccompanied minors, including age-disputed minors, shall never be detained.
8. Vulnerable persons such as minors, pregnant and
lactating women, traumatised persons, persons with special physical or
mental health eneds, persons older than 65 years and chronically or
seriously ill persons, shall never be detained.
9. A person may be detained only if there has been a
prior decision by an independent judicial authority. If a prior
judicial decision cannot be obtained, the person’s detention
shall be subject to an automatic review before a judicial body that is
readily accessible and effective, at a time not exceeding 48 hours
after the detention measure is ordered. The detention order shall be
subject to subsequent automatic reviews by a judicial authority at
least once every 30 days.
10. Detainees shall be provided with timely and free
legal assistance that meets a sufficient quality standard, and shall be
immediately informed of the reasons for his or her detention and the
legal means of challenging the detention order, in a language the
person understands. The costs for competent professional interpretation
shall be covered by the State.
11. Administrative detention shall be as short as possible, and in every case, shall not exceed two months.
12. Living conditions in detention centres such as
nutrition, accommodation, access to health care, privacy, telephone and
access to indoor as well as outdoor activities, shall comply with basic
human rights standards and should not resemble a prison-lie
environment. Detainees shall have access to education and shall be able
to practise their religion.
13. Detainees shall have the right to receive visits
from the outside world, including social, familial and pastoral visits.
Detainees shall also have the right to contact the outside world by
telephone or by mail. Simultaneously, representatives of relevant
non-governmental organisations and of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) shall be granted access to detention
facilities without being required to name a particular person they want
to see.
14. EU and national monitoring mechanisms and bodies
shall be established to independently monitor the use of administrative
detention for asylum seekers and irregular migrants, and to inspect
places of administrative detention.

.
Forum Réfugiés
signale avec satisfaction dans un communiqué l’accord
cadre signé début février par Bernard Kouchner et
Antonio Guterres, Haut Commissaire des Nations unies pour les
réfugiés, qui mentionne la réinstallation.
Pour la première fois, et comme Forum réfugiés le
réclame depuis plus d’un an, la France s’engage
à accueillir sur son territoire des réfugiés vulnérables, bloqués dans des pays de transit qui ne peuvent durablement les protéger.
Réfugiés bhoutanais au Népal, burundais en
Tanzanie, et bien sûr irakiens en Syrie et en Jordanie…
Aujourd’hui, environ trois quarts des 10 millions de
réfugiés recensés dans le monde vivent dans des
situations d’exil prolongé, sans perspective de solution
durable. [communiqué du 6 février 2008]