Accueil »» Défendre »» Positions

 



Positions


.

L'Eglise réformée de France critique la politique d'immigration.

Le synode national de l'Eglise réformée de France, réuni à Toulouse les quatre premiers jours de mai, s'inquiète des conséquences de la politique menée dans le domaine de l'immigration par le gouvernement. Les effets des quotas d'expulsion de la politique du gouvernement sont contraires aux convictions chrétiennes et peuvent être dramatiques pour les étrangers que les protestants côtoient dans leurs paroisses, au travail ou ailleurs. […]
Les délégués se sont élevés contre le projet de directive européenne concernant le retour des étrangers illégaux, qui banalise leur enfermement, dont la possibilité est portée à 18 mois assorti d'une interdiction de territoire européen de 5 ans.
Le synode espère que la future présidence française de l'Union européenne permettra de considérer les ressortissants des pays tiers de manière humaine et digne de la Déclaration des Droits de l'homme.
Lire le communiqué en entier.


.

Position commune des JRS en Europe sur la détention [mars 2008]

The members of JRS in Europe have taken into consideration :
•    The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights
•    The 1950 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11, with Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13
•    The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees
•    The 1966 International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights, and on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
•    The 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child
•    The 1999 UNHCR Revised Guidelines on Applicable Criteria and Standards Relating to the Detention of Asylum Seekers
•    The 2005 Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on Forced Return Including Detention Upon Removal
•    The ongoing jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights

For the purpose of this position paper, and within the context of its work, the members of JRS in Europe agree to the following definition of ‘administrative detention’ :
A situation in which a third-country national is confined within a narrowly bounded or restricted location, and where he or she experiences a deprivation of liberty; this measure must be for administrative reasons and not as a measure of the criminal justice system.

The positions enumerated below shall apply to the administrative detention of asylum seekers and irregular migrants while they are in the territory of a State, or prior to being admitted onto the State’s territory.

The members of JRS in Europe agree to the following principles:
A.    Anyone who is fleeing from severe human rights violations has an inalienable right to seek protection in another country,
B.    Individuals and their families shall not be punished, administratively or criminally, for submitting an asylum claim by the national authorities of the country to which they seek protection,
C.    Authorities of the countries of reception shall take the utmost care to provide for the well-being and safety of asylum applicants,
D.    Children who seek asylum in another country, whether they are accompanied or not, and by reasons of their physical and mental vulnerability, require the provision of special safeguards and care, including appropriate legal protection and the unity of the family, as to the extent that it is in the best interest of the child.

The members of JRS in Europe agree to the following positions:
1.    No asylum seeker shall be detained during his or her asylum procedure.
2.    Administrative detention shall not be used as a deterrent against persons who seek asylum.
3.    Administrative detention of irregular migrants shall be avoided to the utmost extent possible.
4.    If detention cannot be avoided, it should be only used in accordance with the principle of proportionality.
5.    Legislation shall provide for, and policy makers shall implement, alternatives to detention that respect human dignity and fundamental human rights.
6.    Families with children shall not be detained in closed detention centres. Family unity shall be maintained at all times, as long as it is in the best interest of the child. Alternatives to detention must be found in the case of families.
7.    Unaccompanied minors, including age-disputed minors, shall never be detained.
8.    Vulnerable persons such as minors, pregnant and lactating women, traumatised persons, persons with special physical or mental health eneds, persons older than 65 years and chronically or seriously ill persons, shall never be detained.
9.    A person may be detained only if there has been a prior decision by an independent judicial authority. If a prior judicial decision cannot be obtained, the person’s detention shall be subject to an automatic review before a judicial body that is readily accessible and effective, at a time not exceeding 48 hours after the detention measure is ordered. The detention order shall be subject to subsequent automatic reviews by a judicial authority at least once every 30 days.
10.    Detainees shall be provided with timely and free legal assistance that meets a sufficient quality standard, and shall be immediately informed of the reasons for his or her detention and the legal means of challenging the detention order, in a language the person understands. The costs for competent professional interpretation shall be covered by the State.
11.    Administrative detention shall be as short as possible, and in every case, shall not exceed two months.
12.    Living conditions in detention centres such as nutrition, accommodation, access to health care, privacy, telephone and access to indoor as well as outdoor activities, shall comply with basic human rights standards and should not resemble a prison-lie environment. Detainees shall have access to education and shall be able to practise their religion.
13.    Detainees shall have the right to receive visits from the outside world, including social, familial and pastoral visits. Detainees shall also have the right to contact the outside world by telephone or by mail. Simultaneously, representatives of relevant non-governmental organisations and of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) shall be granted access to detention facilities without being required to name a particular person they want to see.
14.    EU and national monitoring mechanisms and bodies shall be established to independently monitor the use of administrative detention for asylum seekers and irregular migrants, and to inspect places of administrative detention.


.
Forum Réfugiés
signale avec satisfaction dans un communiqué l’accord cadre signé début février par Bernard Kouchner et Antonio Guterres, Haut Commissaire des Nations unies pour les réfugiés, qui mentionne la réinstallation.
Pour la première fois, et comme Forum réfugiés le réclame depuis plus d’un an, la France s’engage à accueillir sur son territoire des réfugiés vulnérables, bloqués dans des pays de transit qui ne peuvent durablement les protéger.
Réfugiés bhoutanais au Népal, burundais en Tanzanie, et bien sûr irakiens en Syrie et en Jordanie… Aujourd’hui, environ trois quarts des 10 millions de réfugiés recensés dans le monde vivent dans des situations d’exil prolongé, sans perspective de solution durable. [communiqué du 6 février 2008]

 


    

L'Eglise réformée de France critique la politique d'immigration.

Position des JRS en Europe sur la détention  

  Réfugiés vulnérables (Forum-Réfugiés)

© Service Jésuite des Réfugiés - France / Province de France de la Compagnie de Jésus